Digital
television (DTV) is the transmission of audio and video
by digitally processed and multiplexed signal, in contrast to the totally
analog and channel separated signals used by analog
television. Digital TV can support more than one program in
the same channel bandwidth.
It is an innovative service that represents the first significant
evolution in television technology since color television in the 1950s.
History
Digital
TV's roots have been tied very closely to the availability of inexpensive, high
performance computers. It wasn't until the 1990s that digital TV became a real
possibility.
In
the mid-1980s as Japanese consumer electronics firms forged ahead with the
development of HDTV technology, and as the MUSE analog format proposed by NHK,
a Japanese company was seen as a pacesetter that threatened to eclipse U.S.
electronics companies. Until June 1990, the Japanese MUSE standard based on an
analog system was the front-runner among the more than 23 different technical
concepts under consideration. Then, an American company, General Instrument,
demonstrated the feasibility of a digital television signal. This breakthrough
was of such significance that the FCC was persuaded to delay its decision on an
ATV standard until a digitally based standard could be developed.
In
March 1990, when it became clear that a digital standard was feasible, the FCC
made a number of critical decisions. First, the Commission declared that the
new ATV standard must be more than an enhanced analog signal, but be able to provide a genuine
HDTV signal with at least twice the resolution of existing television images.
Then, to ensure that viewers who did not wish to buy a new digital television
set could continue to receive conventional television broadcasts, it dictated
that the new ATV standard must be capable of being simulcast on different
channels. The new ATV standard also allowed the new DTV signal to be based on
entirely new design principles. Although incompatible with the existing NTSC
standard, the new DTV standard would be able to incorporate many improvements.
The final standard adopted by the FCC did not
require a single standard for scanning formats, aspect ratios, or lines of
resolution. This outcome resulted from a dispute between the consumer
electronics industry (joined by some broadcasters) and the computer industry
(joined by the film industry and some public interest groups) over which of the
two scanning processes interlaced or progressive is superior. Interlaced
scanning, which is used in televisions worldwide, scans even-numbered lines
first, then odd-numbered ones. Progressive scanning, which is the format used
in computers, scans lines in sequences, from top to bottom. The computer
industry argued that progressive scanning is superior because it does not
flicker in the manner of interlaced scanning. It also argued that progressive
scanning enables easier connections with the Internet, and is more cheaply
converted to interlace formats than vice versa. The film industry also
supported progressive scanning because it offers a more efficient means of
converting filmed programming into digital formats. Broadcasters also favored
interlaced scanning because their vast archive of interlaced programming is not
readily compatible with a progressive format.By Mbogo Tausi
BAPRM 42611
No comments:
Post a Comment